1 |
The Swiss also have a dry transfer system (hot cell) facility, so they can transfer fuel from one cask to another, inspect inside casks and maintain casks and contents. |
2 |
The U.S. has no large hot cells designed to do this. There is no U.S. plan in place to prevent or stop major radioactive releases from the canisters. |
3 |
The NRC and California government allows unsafe San Onofre nuclear waste storage by the beach at Camp Pendleton |
4 |
Holtec almost dropped a San Onofre canister 18 feet. |
5 |
All San Onofre Holtec canisters are damaged — NRC ignores problem |
6 |
San Onofre has worst NRC safety complaint record in the nation. |
7 |
The NRC and nuclear industry plan is to hide radiation releases. |
8 |
San Onofre Holtec thin-wall canisters are already cracking. |
9 |
Videos reveal major nuclear waste storage problems at San Onofre |
10 |
More Handouts |
11 |
Darrell Dunn, NRC materials corrosion engineer, claims there is not enough humidity at San Onofre for corrosion and cracking. |
12 |
US nuclear facilities have no on-site method to unload defective or leaking canisters. |
13 |
ACTION ITEM #1: Oppose H.R. 3053 Nuclear Waste Policy Amendment Act of 2018 |
14 |
ACTION ITEM #2: Contact the California Coastal Commission and request they revoke San Onofre Coastal Development Permit 9-15-0228. |
15 |
Edison’s MPR 2017 white paper recommends using the Test Area North (TAN) Hot Shop — this hot cell was destroyed in 2007! |
16 |
Edison received defective nuclear fuel waste canisters from Holtec. |
17 |
Technology does not exist to safely store nuclear fuel waste in a permanent repository — even in the short-term, |
18 |
NWTRB admits no permanent repository solution exists |
19 |
ACTION #3: Educate the public and elected officials. |
20 |
ACTION ITEM#4: Oppose Senate Bill S.2396 and House Bill H.R.4441 |
21 |
ACTION: Revoke San Onofre Coastal Commission nuclear waste storage permit. |
22 |
HANDOUTS: Key nuclear waste handouts to share with elected officials and others |
23 |
Is Southern California Edison’s real plan to hide radiation leaks from cracking canisters? |
24 |
Recommendations for Safer Nuclear Waste Storage and Transport |
25 |
Each canister contains more highly radioactive Cesium-137 than released from Chernobyl. |
26 |
Please share handouts |
27 |
Action: Request the Coastal Commission revoke Edison’s nuclear waste storage permit. |
28 |
Are California and other U.S. nuclear spent fuel waste canisters cracking? |
29 |
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) |
30 |
California Public Utility Commission (approves funds) |
31 |
California Energy Commission (CEC) (sets energy policy) |
32 |
California Coastal Commission (enforces Coastal Act) |
33 |
39 Responses to Home |
34 |
Follow SanOnofreSafety! |